Paths to Reducing Medical Injury: Professional Liability and Discipline vs. Patient Safety — And the Need for a Third Way

@article{Bovbjerg2001PathsTR,
  title={Paths to Reducing Medical Injury: Professional Liability and Discipline vs. Patient Safety — And the Need for a Third Way},
  author={Randall R. Bovbjerg and Robert H. Miller and David W. Shapiro},
  journal={The Journal of Law, Medicine \& Ethics},
  year={2001},
  volume={29},
  pages={369 - 380},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:37304421}
}
The problem of medical injury is finally receiving high-level policy attention, and the Institute of Medicine's landmark report of November 1999, which marshaled the evidence and highlighted new approaches to systematic improvement of safety within systems of care is highlighted.

Liability Reform Should Make Patients Safer: “Avoidable Classes of Events” are a Key Improvement

Too many patients are injured in the course of medical care, and today’s systems of care and of oversight of care too often fail to prevent them, despite generations of increasing legal intervention.

New Directions in Medical Liability Reform

This chapter examines three aspects of health system change since the 1970s—medical progress, industrialization, and cost containment—that have exposed serious weaknesses in the medical liability system and suggests ways to convert liability into a general health policy issue.

Medical liability and patient safety.

The current malpractice crisis can only be understood and addressed as the product of changes in the health care system since the last crisis nearly twenty years ago--changes that also informed the patient safety movement.

State Discipline of Physicians: Assessing State Medical Boards through Case Studies, Final Report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Policy and Evaluation, Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy

This project used six case studies and available national data to assess state Medical Boards' role in disciplining physicians and found several methods appear to improve the throughput and timeliness of conventional discipline.

Medical malpractice.

Commentators lament the “lawsuit lottery,” which provides windfalls for some patients, but no compensation for the vast majority of patients injured by medical care.

Relationship between Healthcare Provider’s Perception about Patient Safety and Patient Safety Implementation in The Emergency Department

The researchers concluded that the relationship between staff perceptions of the emergency department (ED) on patient safety by implementing patient safety at the Regional Hospital emergency department(RSD) Cirebon is concluded.

Triggers of defensive medical behaviours: a cross-sectional study among physicians in the Netherlands

Physicians should be aware that perceived patient pressure for care can lead to them adopting defensive behaviours that negatively affects the quality and safety of patient care.

New Legal Protections for Reporting Patient Errors Under the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act: A Review of the Medical Literature and Analysis

Few published studies were found in clinical journals describing the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA), which raises serious concerns and indicates that physicians may not be aware of the new legal protections afforded for error disclosure.

No-fault compensation for medical injuries: the prospect for error prevention.

An alternative to litigation that does not predicate compensation on proof of practitioner fault is described, how it might be operationalized is suggested, and it is argued that there is a pressing need to test its promise.

Medical injury compensation. A time for testing new approaches.

Despite an improved climate for professional liability insurance, medical injury compensation remains a subject of serious concern. The current tort system has been assailed as too slow, too costly,

Rethinking responsibility for patient injury: accelerated-compensation events, a malpractice and quality reform ripe for a test.

The sometimes erratic, usually slow, and always expensive process of today's payment system undercuts its ability to compensate victims, and the system thus fails to achieve the two main goals of tort law.

No Fault for Medical Injury: Theory and Evidence

This article comprehensively assessed the only two operational medical no-fault programs in the U.S., Virginia and Florida's late 1980s compensation programs for children with severe, birth-related neurological injuries, finding no fault was found to keep liability coverage affordable, to raise funding for compensation, to lower overhead cost, to speed claims resolution and to achieve similar physician and claimant satisfaction as the tort system.

Error in Medicine: Legal Impediments to U.S. Reform

For patient safety research to be successful, all members of the health care enterprise must participate in a coordinated effort to identify and establish effective practices that may reduce human error in medicine.

The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors--could it do harm?

The recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on the quality of care, entitled “To Err Is Human,” has awakened much of the health care system to the challenge of reducing the number of adverse events

Do Doctors Practice Defensive Medicine?

It is concluded that liability reforms can reduce defensive medical practices and that malpractice reforms that directly reduce provider liability pressure lead to reductions of 5 to 9 percent in medical expenditures without substantial effects on mortality or medical complications.

Medical safety: from stories to policy.

This keynote commentary for a symposium on medical secrecy noted that practitioners' silence about medical injuries hurts both patient relations and learning how to avoid similar problems in the

Enterprise Liability for Medical Malpractice and Health Care Quality Improvement

[Assumptions about quality in health care and its defense] are rooted in the past, a past in which the doctor ruled. Strangely, those assumptions have survived the revolutions that now deny the

Risk Management: Extreme Honesty May Be the Best Policy

The benefits of telling patients the truth are reviewed and the possible consequences to the physician and the patient under various circumstances, and the high assessments were substitutes for punitive awards are reviewed.
...