Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

The Tragic Story of Iblis (Satan) in the Qur'an

2009, Islamic University of Europa Journal of Islamic Research

Abstract

The Qur’an describes Iblis-Satan as an important element in the cosmic fate of the human being since he asked to play the role of tempting and leading man astray in his difficult test in the world and God allowed for him. As known, he succeeded in his first attempt and caused the expulsion of Adam and his spouse from Garden. Because the duration of the divine permission expires on the Day of Resurrection, Iblis-Satan and his descendants are still on work. Therefore, man should always remain alert against his old foe and seek refuge in God against Satan’s evil and enticement. This is because he constantly desires that God be denied and makes false promises to man, makes the sins attractive and produces enmity and dissension.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Iblis's rebellion against God's command illustrates the perpetual struggle between good and evil in humanity.
  2. The Qur'an portrays Iblis as an embodiment of temptation, compelling humans to seek refuge in God.
  3. Iblis's dialogue with God raises theological questions regarding predestination and free will.
  4. Scholars interpret Iblis's origin variably, linking him to both angels and jinn, highlighting differing ontological views.
  5. The narrative of Iblis serves as a metaphor for internal moral conflict, transcending literal interpretations.

References (35)

  1. Al-Razi, Mafâtîh al-Ghayb, XXI. 127.
  2. Abû al-Muzaffar al-Isferâyinî, al-Tabsîr fi al-Dîn, ed. Kamal Yûsuf el-Hût, Beirut, 1983, p. 155; Fakhr al-Dîn ar-Râzî, al-Arba'în, ed. A. Hijâzî al-Sakka, Cairo, 1986, I. 350.
  3. 9 Râzî, Mafâtîh al-Ghayb, II. 257-258.
  4. Abû al-Hasan Qâdî 'Abd al-Jabbâr, al-Muhît bi al-Taklîf, ed. 'Umar as-Sayyid Azmî-Ahmad Fuâd al-Ahvânî, Cairo, nd., p. 234-240; İlyas Çelebi, "Husun-Kubuh", Encyclopedia of Islam (DİA), İstanbul 1999, XIX. 61.
  5. See: A.J. Wensinck, "İblis", Encyclopedia of Islam (İA), İstanbul, 1993, V/II. 691. 15 See: 2/Baqara 34, 7/A'râf 11, 15/Hijr 31-32, 17/Isrâ 61, 18/Kahf 50, 20/Tâ-hâ 116, 26/Shu'arâ 95, 34/Saba' 20, 38/Sâd 74-75.
  6. Abû Ja'far Muhammad b. Jarîr al-Tabarî, Jâmi' al-Bayân, Beirut 1999, I. 264-265; Abû Abdillah al-Qurtubî, Al-Jâmi' li Ahkâm al-Qur'ân, Beirut, 1988, I. 203.
  7. Abû Ishâk al-Zajjâj, Ma'âni al-Qur'ân ve I'râbuh, Beirut, 1988, I. 114; Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzî, Zâd al-Masîr fî 'Ilm al-Tafsîr, Beirut, 1987, I. 65.
  8. Jeffery Burton Russel, Lucifer: Ortaçağda Şeytan, trans.: Ahmet Fethi, İstanbul, 2000, p. 58.
  9. Jeffrey Burton Russel, Şeytan: Antikiteden İlkel Hıristiyanlığa Kötülük, trans.: Nuri Plümer, İstanbul, 1999, s. 219.
  10. See: Gerald Messadie, Şeytanın Genel Tarihi, trans.: Işık Ergüden, İstanbul, 1998, s. 500.
  11. Ali Osman Ateş, Kur'an ve Hadislere Göre Şeytan, İstanbul, 1996, pp. 104-195.
  12. Russel, Şeytan, p. 32-33.
  13. Muhammad Rashîd Ridâ, Tafsîr al-Manâr, Beirut, 1999, I. 220.
  14. Russel, Lucifer, p. 61-62.
  15. See: Tabarî, Jâmi al-Bayân, II. 262-264; Abû al-Fidâ ibn Kathîr, Tafsîr al-Qur'ân al-'Azîm, Beirut, 1983, I. 75-77.
  16. Tabarî, Jâmi al-Bayân, II. 261; Ibn Kathîr, Tafsîr al-Qur'ân, I. 75.
  17. A. Saim Kılavuz, "Cin", Encyclopaedia of Islam (DİA), İstanbul, 1993, VIII. 9.
  18. See Ali Osman Ateş, Kur'an ve Hadislere Göre Cinler ve Büyü, İstanbul, 2003, pp. 21-26;
  19. M. Süreyya Şahin, "Cin", Encyclopaedia of Islam (DİA), İstanbul 1993, VIII. 5-8.
  20. See Süleyman Ateş, İnsan ve İnsanüstü, İstanbul, 1985, pp. 37-42.
  21. Bkz. Ateş, Cinler ve Büyü, p. 41 etc.
  22. G. Vajda, "Azazil", The Encyclopaedia of Islam (EI 2 ), new edition, E.J. Brill, Leiden 1979, I. 811;
  23. Russel, Şeytan, p. 221-224; A. Cami Baykurt, "Azâzîl", Encyclopaedia of Islam (İA), İstanbul 1993, II. 90; Salih Tuğ, "Azâzel", Encyclopaedia of Islam (DİA), İstanbul 1991, IV. 312.
  24. Russel, Şeytan, p. 229.
  25. Râzî, Mafâtîh al-Ghayb, XIV. 40.
  26. Qurtubî, al-Jâmi', VII. 113.
  27. Râzî, Mafâtîh al-Ghayb, XIV. 40.
  28. Russel, Lucifer, s. 13.
  29. Russel, Şeytan, s. 11.
  30. Russel, Lucifer, p. 413.
  31. Russel, Lucifer, pp. 57-58.
  32. See: Lütfullah Cebeci, Kur'an'da Şer Problemi, Ankara, 1985, s. 67 etc.
  33. See Abdurrahmân Badawî, Mazâhib al-İslâmiyyîn, Beirut, 1979, I. 492-502; Özdemir, Kötülük Problemi, p. 55-78.
  34. Russel, Lucifer, p. 416-418.
  35. Eric Lee Ormsby, İslam Düşüncesinde 'İlahi Adalet Sorunu (Teodise), trans.: Metin Özdemir, Ankara, 2001, p. 19.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What key characteristics define Iblis according to the Qur'an?add

The Qur'an portrays Iblis as a being of disobedience, arrogance, and deception, contrasting his creation from fire with Adam's creation from clay, highlighting Iblis's refusal to bow down to Adam.

How do interpretations of Iblis's dialogue with God differ?add

Exegetes such as Fakhr al-Din al-Razi assert this dialogue genuinely occurred while others consider it metaphorical, emphasizing its role in illustrating human free will amidst divine predestination.

What implications does Iblis's role have on evil and theodicy in Islam?add

Iblis represents the existence of evil permitted by God, raising the issue of whether divine omnipotence allows for the coexistence of evil in a just cosmos.

How does the concept of Iblis relate to the duality of good and evil?add

The narrative positions Iblis as a necessary element in the divine cosmic plan, indicating that evil is integral to human trials and moral development.

What etymological insights are there about the names Iblis and Shaytan?add

'Iblis' may derive from 'iblas,' meaning despair, while 'Shaytan' suggests distance from good, embodying an evil force common across various cultural narratives.