Прејди на содржината

Мамелуци

Од Википедија — слободната енциклопедија
Мамелуци
مماليك
Османлиски мамелучки ланциери, почеток на 16 век. Бакропис од Даниел Хопфер (ок. 1526–1536), Британски музеј, Лондон[1]
Активна830-ти–1811
ЗемјаАбасидски Калифат
Фатимидски Калифат
Селџучко Царство
Ајубидски Султанат
Мамелучки Султанат
Делхиски Султанат
Отоманско Царство
ВидEnslaved mercenaries,
slave-soldiers,
freed slaves

Мамелуците (/ˈmæmluːk/; арапски: مملوك, romanized: mamlūk (еднина), مماليك, mamālīk (множина);[2] преведено како „оној кој е поседуван“,[5] односно „роб“)[7] биле поробени платеници, робови-војници, и ослободени робови, од неарапско и различно етничко потекло (претежно туранско, кавкаско, монголско[8], источноевропско и балканско) на кои им биле доделени високи воени и административни должности во муслиманскиот свет.[11]

Најдолготрајната мамелучка држава била воената класа во средновековен Египет, која се развила од редовите на робовите-војници.[12] Првобитно Мамелуците биле робови со туранско потекло од Евроазиската степа,[15] но институцијата на воено ропство се проширила на Черкезите,[17] Монголците[8], Апхазите,[18][19][20] Грузијците,[24] Ерменците,[26] Русите,[10] и Унгарците,[8] како и на народите од Балканот како Албанците,[8][27] Грците,[8] и Јужните Словени[29] (види Сакалиби). Тие исто така регрутирале и од Египќаните.[13] Феноменот „Мамелуци/­Гулами“,[9] како што Давид Ајалон го нарекол создавањето на специфична воена класа,[30] бил од големо политичко значење; меѓу другото, траел речиси 1,000 години, од 9-ти до почетокот на 19-ти век. (Види: Џилман.)

Со текот на времето, Мамелуците станале моќна воена класа во разни муслимански општества кои биле контролирани од династички арапски владетели.[31] Особено во Египет и Сирија,[32] но исто така и во Османлиската империја, Левантот, Месопотамија, и Индија, мамелуците имале политичка и воена моќ.[8] Во некои случаи, тие го достигнале рангот на султани, додека во други имале регионална моќ како емири или бегови.[13] Најзабележително, Мамелучките фракции го зазеле султанатот со центар во Египет и Сирија, и го контролирале како Мамелучки Султанат (1250–1517).[33] Мамелучкиот Султанат го победил Илханатот во битката кај Ајн Џалут. Тие претходно се бореле против западноевропските крстоносци во 1154–1169 и 1213–1221, протерувајќи ги од Египет и Левантот. Со заземањето на Руад во 1302, Мамелучкиот Султанат формално ги протерал и последните Крстоносци од Левантот, со што заврши ерата на Крстоносни војни.[8][34]

Иако Мамелуците биле купувани како имот,[35] тие биле поробени платеници[37] и нивниот статус бил над оној на обичните робови, на кои не им било дозволено носење на оружје или извршувањ на одредени задачи.[38] На некои места како Египет, од Ајубидската династија до времето на Мухамед Али, Мамелуците биле сметани за „вистински господари“ и „вистински воини“, со социјален статус над оној на општото население на Средниот Исток.[8]

  1. ↑ „Mamalucke (Mamelukes)“. www.britishmuseum.org. London: British Museum. 2021. Архивирано од изворникот 29 September 2021. Посетено на 3 March 2021.
  2. 1 2 Ayalon, David (2012). „Mamlūk“. Во Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P.; Lewis, B.; Pellat, Ch. (уред.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. 6. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0657. ISBN 978-90-04-08112-3. Занемарен непознатиот параметар |orig-date= (help)
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Levanoni, Amalia (2010). „Part II: Egypt and Syria (Eleventh Century Until the Ottoman Conquest) – The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648–784/1250–1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784–923/1382–1517)“. Во Fierro, Maribel (уред.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 2: The Western Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge and New York City: Cambridge University Press. стр. 237–284. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521839570.010. ISBN 978-1-139-05615-1. The Arabic term mamlūk literally means 'owned' or 'slave', and was used for the White Turkish slaves of Pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies. Mamlūk units formed an integral part of Muslim armies from the third/ninth century, and Mamlūk involvement in government became an increasingly familiar occurrence in the medieval Middle East. The road to absolute rule lay open before them in Egypt when the Mamlūk establishment gained military and political domination during the reign of the Ayyūbid ruler of Egypt, al-Ṣāliḥ Ayyūb (r. 637–47/1240–49).
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 „Warrior kings: A look at the history of the Mamluks“. The Report – Egypt 2012: The Guide. Oxford Business Group. 2012. стр. 332–334. Архивирано од изворникот 25 September 2020. Посетено на 1 March 2021. The Mamluks, who descended from non-Arab slaves who were naturalised to serve and fight for ruling Arab dynasties, are revered as some of the greatest warriors the world has ever known. Although the word mamluk translates as "one who is owned", the Mamluk soldiers proved otherwise, gaining a powerful military standing in various Muslim societies, particularly in Egypt. They would also go on to hold political power for several centuries during a period known as the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt. [...] Before the Mamluks rose to power, there was a long history of slave soldiers in the Middle East, with many recruited into Arab armies by the Abbasid rulers of Baghdad in the ninth century. The tradition was continued by the dynasties that followed them, including the Fatimids and Ayyubids (it was the Fatimids who built the foundations of what is now Islamic Cairo). For centuries, the rulers of the Arab world recruited men from the lands of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is hard to discern the precise ethnic background of the Mamluks, given that they came from a number of ethnically mixed regions, but most are thought to have been Turkic (mainly Kipchak and Cuman) or from the Caucasus (predominantly Circassian, but also Armenian and Georgian). The Mamluks were recruited forcibly to reinforce the armies of Arab rulers. As outsiders, they had no local loyalties, and would thus fight for whoever owned them, not unlike mercenaries. Furthermore, the Turks and Circassians had a ferocious reputation as warriors. The slaves were either purchased or abducted as boys, around the age of 13, and brought to the cities, most notably to Cairo and its Citadel. Here they would be converted to Islam and would be put through a rigorous military training regime that focused particularly on horsemanship. A code of behaviour not too dissimilar to that of the European knights' Code of Chivalry was also inculcated and was known as Furusiyya. As in many military establishments to this day the authorities sought to instill an esprit de corps and a sense of duty among the young men. The Mamluks would have to live separately from the local populations in their garrisons, which included the Citadel and Rhoda Island, also in Cairo.
  5. ↑ [3][4]
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Грешка во наводот: Погрешна ознака <ref>; нема зададено текст за наводите по име Britannica.
  7. ↑ [2][3][6]
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Stowasser, Karl (1984). „Manners and Customs at the Mamluk Court“. Muqarnas. Leiden: Brill Publishers. 2 (The Art of the Mamluks): 13–20. doi:10.2307/1523052. ISSN 0732-2992. JSTOR 1523052. S2CID 191377149. The Mamluk slave warriors, with an empire extending from Libya to the Euphrates, from Cilicia to the Arabian Sea and the Sudan, remained for the next two hundred years the most formidable power of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean – champions of Sunni orthodoxy, guardians of Islam's holy places, their capital, Cairo, the seat of the Sunni caliph and a magnet for scholars, artists, and craftsmen uprooted by the Mongol upheaval in the East or drawn to it from all parts of the Muslim world by its wealth and prestige. Under their rule, Egypt passed through a period of prosperity and brilliance unparalleled since the days of the Ptolemies. [...] They ruled as a military aristocracy, aloof and almost totally isolated from the native population, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, and their ranks had to be replenished in each generation through fresh imports of slaves from abroad. Only those who had grown up outside Muslim territory and who entered as slaves in the service either of the sultan himself or of one of the Mamluk emirs were eligible for membership and careers within their closed military caste. The offspring of Mamluks were free-born Muslims and hence excluded from the system: they became the awlād al-nās, the "sons of respectable people", who either fulfilled scribal and administrative functions or served as commanders of the non-Mamluk ḥalqa troops. Some two thousand slaves were imported annually: Qipchaq, Azeris, Uzbec Turks, Mongols, Avars, Circassians, Georgians, Armenians, Greeks, Bulgars, Albanians, Serbs, Hungarians.
  9. 1 2 Freamon, Bernard K. (2019). „The 'Mamluk/Ghulam Phenomenon' – Slave Sultans, Soldiers, Eunuchs, and Concubines“. Во Freamon, Bernard K. (уред.). Possessed by the Right Hand: The Problem of Slavery in Islamic Law and Muslim Cultures. Studies in Global Slavery. 8. Leiden: Brill Publishers. стр. 219–244. doi:10.1163/9789004398795_006. ISBN 978-90-04-36481-3. S2CID 191690007. Ibn Khaldun argued that in the midst of the decadence that became the hallmark of the later Abbasid Caliphate, providence restored the "glory and the unity" of the Islamic faith by sending the Mamluks: "loyal helpers, who were brought from the House of War to the House of Islam under the rule of slavery, which hides in itself a divine blessing." His expression of the idea that slavery, considered to be a degrading social condition to be avoided at all costs, might contain "a divine blessing", was the most articulate expression of Muslim thinking on slavery since the early days of Islam. Ibn Khaldun's general observation about the paradoxical nature of slavery brings to mind Hegel's reflections on the subject some five hundred years later. The great philosopher observed that, in many instances, it is the slave who ultimately gains the independent consciousness and power to become the actual master of his or her owner. The Mamluk/Ghulam Phenomenon is a good historical example of this paradox.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Poliak, A. N. (2005) [1942]. „The Influence of C̱ẖingiz-Ḵẖān's Yāsa upon the General Organization of the Mamlūk State“. Во Hawting, Gerald R. (уред.). Muslims, Mongols, and Crusaders: An Anthology of Articles. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 10. London & New York: Routledge. стр. 27–41. doi:10.1017/S0041977X0009008X. ISBN 978-0-7007-1393-6. JSTOR 609130. S2CID 155480831. Архивирано од изворникот 2 January 2024. Посетено на 1 March 2021.
  11. ↑ [3][4][9][8][10]
  12. ↑ [3][4][6][8]
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Richards, Donald S. (1998). „Chapter 3: Mamluk amirs and their families and households“. Во Philipp, Thomas; Haarmann, Ulrich (уред.). The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society. Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. стр. 32–54. ISBN 978-0-521-03306-0. Архивирано од изворникот 4 April 2023. Посетено на 4 April 2023.
  14. ↑ Isichei, Elizabeth (1997). A History of African Societies to 1870. Cambridge University Press. стр. 192. Посетено на 8 November 2008.
  15. ↑ [3][4][6][8][10][13][14]
  16. ↑ McGregor, Andrew James (2006). A Military History of Modern Egypt: From the Ottoman Conquest to the Ramadan War. Greenwood Publishing Group. стр. 15. ISBN 978-0-275-98601-8. By the late fourteenth century, Circassians from the North Caucasus region had become the majority in the Mamluk ranks.
  17. ↑ [4][8][10][13][16]
  18. ↑ А.Ш.Кадырбаев, Сайф-ад-Дин Хайр-Бек – абхазский "король эмиров" Мамлюкского Египта (1517–1522), "Материалы первой международной научной конференции, посвященной 65-летию В.Г.Ардзинба". Сухум: АбИГИ, 2011, pp. 87–95
  19. ↑ Thomas Philipp, Ulrich Haarmann (eds), The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 115–116.
  20. ↑ Jane Hathaway, The Politics of Households in Ottoman Egypt: The Rise of the Qazdaglis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 103–104.
  21. ↑ "Relations of the Georgian Mamluks of Egypt with Their Homeland in the Last Decades of the Eighteenth Century". Daniel Crecelius and Gotcha Djaparidze. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 45, No. 3 (2002), pp. 320–341. ISSN 0022-4995
  22. ↑ Basra, the failed Gulf state: separatism and nationalism in southern Iraq, p. 19, при Гугл книги By Reidar Visser
  23. ↑ Hathaway, Jane (February 1995). „The Military Household in Ottoman Egypt“. International Journal of Middle East Studies. 27 (1): 39–52. doi:10.1017/s0020743800061572. S2CID 62834455.
  24. ↑ [4][8][21][22][23]
  25. ↑ Walker, Paul E. Exploring an Islamic Empire: Fatimid History and its Sources (London, I. B. Tauris, 2002)
  26. ↑ [4][8][10][25]
  27. 1 2 István Vásáry (2005) Cuman and Tatars, Cambridge University Press.
  28. ↑ T. Pavlidis, A Concise History of the Middle East, Chapter 11: "Turks and Byzantine Decline". 2011
  29. ↑ [8][27][28]
  30. ↑ Ayalon, David (1979). The Mamlūk military society. Variorum Reprints. ISBN 978-0-86078-049-6.
  31. ↑ [3][4][6][8][13]
  32. ↑ [3][4][6][13]
  33. ↑ [3][4][6][13]
  34. ↑ Asbridge, Thomas. „The Crusades Episode 3“. BBC. Архивирано од изворникот 3 February 2012. Посетено на 5 February 2012.
  35. ↑ [3][4][6][8][13]
  36. ↑ Behrens-Abouseif, Doris. Cairo of the Mamluks: A History of Architecture and Its Culture. New York: Macmillan, 2008.Предлошка:ISBN?Предлошка:Page?
  37. ↑ [3][4][6][13][36]
  38. ↑ [3][4][6][13]
Преземено од „https://mk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Мамелуци&oldid=5471478“