Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies

Qc Terme

I have created a new page about the italian company qc Terme and i woukd greatly appreciate your help in reviewing it.I need the page to be approved by December 31st. The draft is called Draft:QC_Terme . I would be grateful for any feedback or suggestions to make the article acceptable for publication.

Discussion at Talk:Viagogo § Updating history

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Viagogo § Updating history, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Stephanie BINK (talk) 20:24, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of StaffDNA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StaffDNA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StaffDNA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Request: Proposed Updates to Astera Labs Infobox and History

Hi Wikipedia editors, I’m currently an intern at Astera Labs. I’ve noticed that the current Astera Labs article is missing some information and could benefit from updates for accuracy and consistency with similar company pages.

I’ve drafted a proposed version in my sandbox and posted this request on Astera Labs' Talk page. I welcome any feedback and would be grateful if an editor could review and consider implementing these changes. Thank you!

SemiconductorApprentice (talk) 01:29, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Updating Ligand Pharmaceuticals introduction

Hello! I'm an employee at Ligand Pharmaceuticals. I have an active edit request on the company article's Talk page that asks independent editors to consider a few revisions to the article's introduction. There's some out-of-date information in there as well as a couple of claims that I'm not sure belong at the very top of the page.

You can view my request by following this link. Thanks very much to anyone who takes the time to consider it. MelanieLigand (talk) 13:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Requesting review of edit request: Torre.ai page lead update

Hello, I have made an edit request on the Talk:Torre.ai page to update the lead section with more neutral, well-sourced content. Because I have a declared COI (I work with the company), I am requesting review from uninvolved editors. The edit request is here: Talk:Torre.ai#Proposed lead update (COI)

If any volunteers from this project could take a look, I’d greatly appreciate it.

Thank you! Jprodmo (talk) 15:58, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Peebles Corporation

I am an employee of Peebles Corporation and made a request for edits. Can someone advise me the best route to move this forward? Kpryles550 (talk) 01:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

@Kpryles550:, it appears your request was already handled at Talk:Peebles Corporation. Future requests do not need to be posted on this talk page, just the talk page for Peebles Corporation. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:20, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:The Smith's Snackfood Company#Requested move 6 September 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Smith's Snackfood Company#Requested move 6 September 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. CNC (talk) 12:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amoi

The article Amoi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for almost 8 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. The Polish language article has potential, but it's still not significant coverage. Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

@Bearian:, I see the prod was already removed but did some digging to ensure notability. Long route so bear with me. Started searching in English but did not find much. I then went to the Chinese Wikipedia version but the three sources listed there were all broken or unavailable. In order to find some good sources, I copied and pasted its Chinese name ("夏新科技") into Google and then used Google Translate for a few that looked like they would meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Added one that did. Tagged as needing more sources but likely would pass AfD. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:15, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Fantastic. I love a good article rescue, especially when someone finds sources hidden in the Internet's depths. Bearian (talk) 10:42, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

I love rabbit holes. Thankfully, this was a good one for a change. --CNMall41 (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Peer review of Sfil

Hello, I translated the article Sfil from French, which I also wrote, as part of a paid contribution. I tried my best to follow WP:NPOV, but in doubt, another contributor added a banner requesting a review. So I made a request here a month ago, but I haven't heard back since. Would any of you be kind enough to take a look? Thank you very much! Jul.H (talk) 06:29, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Answered here. Appreciate the disclosure of PAID as many don't do such. I realize that going through COIREQUEST is not a requirement, but could potentially save these type of things from happening in the future. As stated on that talk page, I will look closer later today and see if any cleanup is warranted and if tag(s) can be removed. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:08, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Talk:NCIS: Sydney has an RfC

Talk:NCIS: Sydney has an RfC for possible consensus related to production companies. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. newsjunkie (talk) 20:23, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Review request: atmo company

Hello, editors! I've created a new company page in draft mode: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Atmo_(Atmotube). I see that the review will take more than eight weeks. While that time passes, I wanted to get valuable feedback from experienced editors in case the article has any obvious issues. Weltgericht (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

AT&T Corporation has an RfC

AT&T Corporation has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 09:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Bolton Group article update

Hello everyone :) two weeks ago I proposed an update to the “Subsidiaries” section in the Bolton Group article talk page. Any opinions are welcome. Thank you! Pirelli19 (talk) 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:First Women Bank#Requested move 20 October 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:First Women Bank#Requested move 20 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —Fortuna, imperatrix 13:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Request for feedback: Draft article on Openly, Inc.

Hi everyone,

I’ve drafted an article about Openly, Inc., an American insurance technology company, at User:WhiteFactLoom/Openly, Inc..

Could an experienced editor please review it and share feedback on its notability and sourcing before I submit it to Articles for Creation (AfC)?

Thanks! WhiteFactLoom (talk) 23:06, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Company

This needs work. Bearian (talk) 01:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

@Bearian:, Lots of work. I found enough to verify it's notable and there is this which is a starting point (although will need to find more reliable sources to support what is in that source). Will likely take a while.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Bearian (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bearian:, just finished up what I could. Have a look and trim if necessary. About as far as I could get. There are a few images in Commons but don't see any of them as being relevant. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Bearian (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Disney+ Hotstar#Requested move 12 October 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Disney+ Hotstar#Requested move 12 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 10:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gas City, Ltd.

The article Gas City, Ltd. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 8 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Never was notable as a company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Sinclair Oil Corporation

In the last few days a large amount of content was removed from Sinclair Oil Corporation.

Is this what the community wants or a rogue editor? 2A02:2455:8423:4800:DF2E:D34:6C9:45E2 (talk) 19:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Update stats in Project Management Institute infobox

Hi editors! My name is MaryKate, and I'm employed by Project Management Institute. I have an open request to update the infobox, and wondered if I can improve its independent sourcing.

Let me know if there are any questions or concerns. Hope to see you over on the PMI Talk page! MK at PMI (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Answered on the talk page. Seem simple enough. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Adtalem Global Education

Hello! On behalf of Adtalem Global Education, I have submitted a few COI edit requests to improve the article from a Wikipedia perspective. The article has had two warning banners for over a decade and my requests are related to acquisitions and divestitures, history, campuses and enrollment, and finances.

I'm seeking editor assistance to review and implement the requests appropriately, if any project members are interested in taking a look. Thanks for your consideration, Inkian Jason (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Looking for help with Trimble History section

Hello, I'm an employee at Trimble checking to see if any editors at this WikiProject might have time to review a History section draft I've placed on the Trimble Talk page. The draft significantly expands the existing section by filling in informational gaps. It also clarifies existing passages and firms up the section's sourcing. Thanks in advance to any folks here who take the time to review it! Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Highbridge Multi-Strategy Fund

The article Highbridge Multi-Strategy Fund has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as unsourced for 6 years. I can't find significant coverage, just listings. Possibly defunct?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 05:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Toast. Looks like it was liquidated in 2022 and there is very little as far as sourcing. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:40, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Air Greenland

Air Greenland has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

StubHub

Hi WikiProject Companies, I have a COI edit request over at StubHub that may be of interest to folks here. Would love any thoughts or feedback you might have! Cheers Stephanie BINK (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Asking for help with update to Eli Lilly and Company introduction

Hello, I'm an employee at Eli Lilly and Company, and I'm on this WikiProject to ask if any editors here would be interested in reviewing an update I'm requesting to the Lilly article's introduction. It's a pretty short request, so hopefully it won't take much time to inspect. Here's a link to the request. If you have any questions about it, please don't hesitate to ask. Thanks! JWatLilly (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Request for review: Draft SavATree article (COI)

Disclosure: I am an employee of SavATree (my COI statement is on my User page). Because of this conflict of interest, I am not editing the SavATree article directly. I have prepared a draft article in a neutral tone with independent, reliable sources. Could an uninvolved editor please review the draft and, if appropriate, move it into the main article space? The draft is available in my sandbox here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AnnMEdits/sandbox Thank you very much for your time and assistance! AnnMEdits (talk) 22:18, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for The Churchill Machine Tool Company

The Churchill Machine Tool Company has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Request for review: California Closets COI edit

Hello WikiProject Companies editors,

I’m a paid editor who has disclosed my status on my user page. I recently submitted an edit request on Talk:California Closets to update factual and sourced content, but haven’t received a response after several weeks.

Could someone please review the pending COI edit request and provide feedback? I’ve formatted it according to the {{request edit}} guidelines.

Link to my request: Talk:California Closets#Proposed update to History section (Paid editor disclosure)

Thank you for your time and help! Meredithjg (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

@Meredithjg:, you will need to follow WP:COIREQUEST. I took a look at the talk page and you have not added the COI template in order to move it into the COI edit queue. Once you do, an editor will come along in time and review the request. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:18, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Seeking notability evidence for Millennium Interactive

Millennium Interactive's Wikipedia entry survived a deletion vote in 2007, but was redirected to its successor company by an editor in 2017. I would imagine Millennium, which released over 30 games, to be notable in its own right, but since most of its activity was pre-web, it is hard to find independent sources. The argument has been made that reviews of the company's games do not confer noteworthiness, as per WP:COMPANY.

I would therefore be interested if someone could find relevant sources to establish noteworthiness in order to restore the article. Only a Floor Tile (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Answered at Talk:Guerrilla Cambridge.--CNMall41 (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41 – Thanks for the guidance. I have added "edit COI" to move this request into the COI edit queue. Meredithjg (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I don't think you are replying to the right thing @Meredithjg. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 16:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@Meredithjg:, I don't mind helping PAID editors, but it seems you are just throwing things against the wall here. Competency is still required on your part. You have left the template on this page instead of the talk page of the article where it belongs. See WP:COIREQUEST and make sure you understand the proper procedure for making such requests. Otherwise, it is highly unlikely that anyone will respond to your request. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Disagreement over past vs present tense at Rogue Ales

The company has shut down operations and is in the process of going through bankruptcy process and per the sources, it has future meetings with creditors. To me, this isn't a company that had already dissolved. Several temp accounts keep changing it to the past tense, but I believe it's correct to keep it in the present tense until formally recognized as dissolved. What is the standard MOS for companies articles? Graywalls (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@Graywalls:, technically it would still be a company until it legally dissolves, even though it ceased operations. I am not really how sure to phrase it but keeping the "is" for the time being is something I would support until we has sources that talk about it in the past tense. I have watchlisted for now.--CNMall41 (talk) 00:43, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Soros Fund Management

Hi editors, I have an edit request at Soros Fund Management that may be of interest to folks here. Cheers BINK Robin (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Request for Review – Robert Half Article

Hi WikiProject Companies,

I’ve identified areas in the Robert Half article that could be updated for accuracy and improved sourcing. I’ve drafted a proposed revision in my sandbox and noted this on the article’s Talk page.

As I have a conflict of interest (COI) due to my affiliation with Robert Half, I will not edit the article directly. Feedback and review from independent editors would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ~~~~ NeutralEditorCA (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Titra Studios

The article Titra Studios has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 16 years. Tagged for notability concerns for 6 years. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 12:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)