Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastcliff, Johannesburg

Eastcliff, Johannesburg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Unsourced. A neighborhood inside a city isn't inherently notable or an automatic pass of WP:GEOLAND because the city itself has a page. Per WP:NOPAGE this could also be covered in the article on the city.4meter4 (talk) 23:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 23:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Oakdene, Johannesburg. Although Google gives this place separate boundaries from Oakdene and it's a populated place, I don't think it needs its own article. The local news website sometimes treats it separately and other times links it to Oakdene.[1]. An estate agent selling a property in Eastcliff, also links it to Oakdene.[2] The source in the Oakdene article though not official and may not be reliable, also places Eastcliff within Oakdene. Eastcliff looks to be too insignificant to require a mention in the Johannesburg article, so I don't advocate a redirect there. In addition, Eastcliff is not noted as a named suburb in what appears to be an official list, unlike Oakdene.[3]Rupples (talk) 07:56, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the redirecting proposal?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:07, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]