Handling Hospital Errors: Is Disclosure the Best Defense?

@article{Wu1999HandlingHE,
  title={Handling Hospital Errors: Is Disclosure the Best Defense?},
  author={Albert W Wu},
  journal={Annals of Internal Medicine},
  year={1999},
  volume={131},
  pages={970-972},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:36889006}
}
Encouraging data is provided on an institutional policy that includes early review of injuries, full disclosure of findings to the patient, and fair compensation that is currently in use at a Veterans Affairs medical center in Lexington, Kentucky.
View on PubMed
doi.org
109 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
2
Background Citations
31
Methods Citations
1
Results Citations
1

109 Citations

Communicating with Patients About Adverse Medical Events: If, When, and How to Say “I’m Sorry”

This chapter discusses when disclosure is appropriate, the timing, what should be disclosed, the process of disclosure, the legal consequences, caring for the caregiver, as well as how to handle disclosure for minors, multiple victims of harm, and those lacking capacity.

Non-disclosure of medical errors an egregious violation of ethical principles.

Moral courage is needed if doctors are to do the right thing when medical errors occur and this moral courage can be facilitated by institutions having policies and guidelines on disclosure of errors in place, training doctors and other hospital staff on how to disclose medical errors and providing emotional support for doctors who make mistakes.

"Sorry” Is Never Enough: How State Apology Laws Fail to Reduce Medical Malpractice Liability Risk.

Examining a dataset of malpractice claims obtained directly from a large national malpractice insurer presents a unique opportunity to understand the effect of apology laws on the entire litigation landscape in ways that are not possible using only publicly available data.

Does full disclosure of medical errors affect malpractice liability? The jury is still out.

Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients: tackling three tough cases.

A standard of materiality is proposed that can help clinicians to decide what information to disclose and how institutions can overlook patients' and families' needs following errors.

Does Sorry Work? The Impact of Apology Laws on Medical Malpractice Benjamin Ho Cornell University

Using a difference-in-differences estimation, it is found that State-level apology laws could expedite the settlement process and increase the number of settlements by 15% within 3 to 5 years of adopting the laws.

What makes an error unacceptable? A factorial survey on the disclosure of medical errors.

In errors with a severe outcome, an honest, empathic, and accountable approach to the error decreases the probability of participants' support for strong sanctions against the physician involved by 59%.

Unanticipated harm to patients: deciding when to disclose outcomes.

Patient Safety and Medical Malpractice: A Case Study

A 52-year-old woman with severe pneumonia and impending respiratory failure was evaluated on the medical ward of a community hospital by Dr. Harris, an internist, and transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for urgent intubation by a critical care specialist.

Subtracting insult from injury: addressing cultural expectations in the disclosure of medical error

It is recommended that learning how to disclose errors, apologise to injured patients, ensure that these patients’ needs are met, and confront the emotional dimensions of one’s own mistakes should be part of medical education and reinforced by the conduct of senior physicians.
...

15 References

Risk Management: Extreme Honesty May Be the Best Policy

The benefits of telling patients the truth are reviewed and the possible consequences to the physician and the patient under various circumstances, and the high assessments were substitutes for punitive awards are reviewed.

To tell the truth: ethical and practical issues in disclosing medical mistakes to patients.

How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes? A survey of internal medicine patients in an academic setting.

Patients desire an acknowledgment from their physicians of even minor errors, and doing so may actually reduce the risk of punitive actions, which reinforces the importance of open communication between patients and physicians.

Minimizing malpractice risks by role clarification. The confusing transition from tort to contract.

Physicians' patterns of allocating responsibility by express and implied agreements should be evaluated and changes made where needed and common misunderstandings that erode relationships and lead to litigation should be clarified.

Medical injury compensation. A time for testing new approaches.

Despite an improved climate for professional liability insurance, medical injury compensation remains a subject of serious concern. The current tort system has been assailed as too slow, too costly,…

Do house officers learn from their mistakes?*

House officers who accepted responsibility for the mistake and discussed it were more likely to report constructive changes in practice and residents were less likely to make constructive changes if they attributed the mistake to job overload.

Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.

Medical-malpractice litigation infrequently compensates patients injured by medical negligence and rarely identifies, and holds providers accountable for, substandard care.

Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status.

Poor and uninsured patients are significantly less likely to sue for malpractice, even after controlling for the presence of medical injury, and gender and race were not independently associated with risk of malpractice claims.

Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries.

Self-reported reasons that prompt families to file malpractice claims following perinatal injuries are identified and families' descriptions of medical events, advice from acquaintances, and the quality of physician-family communication are described.

Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.

The study identifies specific and teachable communication behaviors associated with fewer malpractice claims for primary care physicians and surgeons and advises physicians to use these findings as they seek to improve communication and decrease malpractice risk.