Why we’re editing women scientists onto Wikipedia

@article{Wade2018WhyWE,
  title={Why we’re editing women scientists onto Wikipedia},
  author={Jess Wade and Maryam Zaringhalam},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2018},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:186774096}
}
And here's why you should, too, say Jess Wade and Maryam Zaringhalam. And here's why you should, too, say Jess Wade and Maryam Zaringhalam.
View via Publisher
16 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
1
Background Citations
5

16 Citations

Why and how medical schools, peer-reviewed journals, and research funders should promote Wikipedia editing

An attempt is made to reconcile and identify the key stakeholders affected by Wikipedia’s accuracy and credibility, including medical institutions such as peer-reviewed journals, medical schools, research funders and academic reward systems.

The Gender Divide in Wikipedia: A Computational Approach to Assessing the Impact of Two Feminist Interventions

It is found that the interventions are successful at adding content about women that would otherwise be missing, but they are less successful at addressing structural biases that limit the visibility of women focused content.

The Gender Divide in Wikipedia: Quantifying and Assessing the Impact of Two Feminist Interventions

Through a quantitative analysis of over 11,000 Wikipedia articles, an evaluation of two popular feminist interventions designed to counteract gender inequality within digital information projects finds that the interventions are successful at adding content about women that would otherwise be missing, but they are less successful at addressing structural biases that limit the visibility of that content.

“Too Soon” to count? How gender and race cloud notability considerations on Wikipedia

It is argued that awareness of hidden biases on Wikipedia is critical to the objective and equitable application of the notability criteria across race and gender both on the encyclopedia and beyond.

Reducing Bias in Wikipedia’s Coverage of Political Scientists

    Samuel Baltz
    Political Science
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2022
One in five political scientists with biographies on Wikipedia are women and almost half are American. Biases onWikipedia can cause real harm, so I created or expanded a political science–related…

Hidden No More - On- and Offline Rewritings of the History of Women in Science

While names like Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, or Stephen Hawking have a familiar ring to us, most conversations about women in the history of science begin and end with Marie Curie. In 2014, a…

Global gender differences in Wikipedia readership

Novel evidence of gender differences in Wikipedia readership and how they manifest in records of user behavior is presented, laying the foundation for identifying pathways toward knowledge equity in the usage of online encyclopedic knowledge.

Assessing gage: an online tool for improving gender visibility in STEMM

An assessment of the directory of women in STEMM fields is undertaken using surveys, Google Analytics, and focus groups to understand its efficacy and direction to date and identify future improvements the authors pledge to undertake.

Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition

It is found that women in Physics, Economics and Philosophy are considerable less likely than men to be recognised on Wikipedia across all levels of achievement.

Paul Broca: from fame to shame?

In 2016, the University of Bordeaux named its new neuroscience building after Paul Broca. A debate was recently ignited about the appropriateness of this choice, however, given Broca's endorsement of…